new unit for speed of light

This commit is contained in:
nam
2017-01-27 12:23:12 -05:00
parent 2d693b3a41
commit daee5ed40d
7 changed files with 34 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ to reduce the radiative pion capture and other prompt backgrounds. Cosmic
backgrounds are backgrounds are
rejected using a combination of rejected using a combination of
passive shielding, veto counters and reconstruction cuts. The momenta of beam passive shielding, veto counters and reconstruction cuts. The momenta of beam
muons used in the experiment were \SI{52}{\MeV\per\cc} and muons used in the experiment were \SI{52}{\MeV\per\hepclight} and
\SI{53}{\MeV\per\cc}, and the momentum spread was 2\%. \SI{53}{\MeV\per\hepclight}, and the momentum spread was 2\%.
\begin{figure}[htbp] \centering \begin{figure}[htbp] \centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figs/sindrumII_setup} \includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figs/sindrumII_setup}
\caption{SINDRUM-II experimental set up, reprinted from \caption{SINDRUM-II experimental set up, reprinted from
@@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ transport section.
The \ang{180} bending electron transport solenoids help remove line-of-sight The \ang{180} bending electron transport solenoids help remove line-of-sight
between the target and the detector system. It works similarly to the muon between the target and the detector system. It works similarly to the muon
transportation section, but is tuned differently to accept electrons of about transportation section, but is tuned differently to accept electrons of about
\SI{105}{\MeV\per\cc}. A compensation field of \SI{0.17}{\tesla} along the \SI{105}{\MeV\per\hepclight}. A compensation field of \SI{0.17}{\tesla} along the
vertical direction will be applied. Electrons with momentum less than vertical direction will be applied. Electrons with momentum less than
\SI{80}{\MeV\per\cc} are blocked at the exit of this section by \SI{80}{\MeV\per\hepclight} are blocked at the exit of this section by
a collimator to reduce DIO electrons rate. The net acceptance of signals of a collimator to reduce DIO electrons rate. The net acceptance of signals of
\mueconv is about 0.32, and the detector hit rate will be in the order of \mueconv is about 0.32, and the detector hit rate will be in the order of
\SI{1}{\kHz} for a muon stopping rate of \SI{E11}{\Hz}. \SI{1}{\kHz} for a muon stopping rate of \SI{E11}{\Hz}.
@@ -429,12 +429,12 @@ active shielding against cosmic rays is considered.
The tracking detector has to provide a momentum resolution less than The tracking detector has to provide a momentum resolution less than
%%TODO 350 or 150? %%TODO 350 or 150?
350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} in order to achieve a sensitivity of 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} in order to achieve a sensitivity of
\sn{3}{-17}. There are five stations of straw-tube gas chambers, each provides \sn{3}{-17}. There are five stations of straw-tube gas chambers, each provides
two dimensional information. Each straw tube is 5~\si{\milli\meter} in diameter two dimensional information. Each straw tube is 5~\si{\milli\meter} in diameter
and has a 25-\si{\micro\meter}-thick wall. According to a GEANT4 Monte Carlo and has a 25-\si{\micro\meter}-thick wall. According to a GEANT4 Monte Carlo
simulation, a position resolution of 250~\si{\micro\meter} can be obtained, simulation, a position resolution of 250~\si{\micro\meter} can be obtained,
which is enough for 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} momentum resolution. The which is enough for 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} momentum resolution. The
DIO background of 0.15 events is expected. DIO background of 0.15 events is expected.
The electromagnetic calorimeter serves three purposes: a) to measure electrons The electromagnetic calorimeter serves three purposes: a) to measure electrons
@@ -450,11 +450,11 @@ hit positions. Two candidate crystals, GSO and LYSO, are under consideration.
The requirements for \mueconv signals are: The requirements for \mueconv signals are:
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item from the 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc}~momentum resolution, the signal \item from the 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight}~momentum resolution, the signal
region is determined to be 103.5~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc}~to region is determined to be 103.5~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight}~to
105.2~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc}; 105.2~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight};
\item transversal momentum of signal electrons is required to be greater than \item transversal momentum of signal electrons is required to be greater than
52~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} to remove backgrounds from beam electrons and 52~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} to remove backgrounds from beam electrons and
muons decay in flight; muons decay in flight;
\item timing wise, conversion electrons should arrive in the time window of \item timing wise, conversion electrons should arrive in the time window of
detection which is about 700~\si{\nano\second}~after each proton pulses detection which is about 700~\si{\nano\second}~after each proton pulses
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ avalanche gain of
approximately \sn{4}{4}. A gas mixture of helium:isobutane(90:10) is preferred approximately \sn{4}{4}. A gas mixture of helium:isobutane(90:10) is preferred
since the CDC momentum resolution is dominated by multiple scattering. With since the CDC momentum resolution is dominated by multiple scattering. With
these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of
197~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} is achievable according to our tracking study. 197~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} is achievable according to our tracking study.
\begin{table}[htb] \begin{table}[htb]
\begin{center} \begin{center}
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of
\label{ssub:hit_rate_on_the_cdc} \label{ssub:hit_rate_on_the_cdc}
The maximal usable muon beam intensity will be limited by the detector hit The maximal usable muon beam intensity will be limited by the detector hit
occupancy. Charge particles with transversal momentum greater than 70 occupancy. Charge particles with transversal momentum greater than 70
\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} are expected to reach the CDC. Those include: \si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} are expected to reach the CDC. Those include:
protons emitted from nuclear muon capture, and electrons from muon decay in protons emitted from nuclear muon capture, and electrons from muon decay in
orbit (DIO). It is calculated that the hit rate due to proton emission dominates, orbit (DIO). It is calculated that the hit rate due to proton emission dominates,
where the highest rate is \SI{11}{\kHz\per}cell compares to where the highest rate is \SI{11}{\kHz\per}cell compares to
@@ -733,9 +733,9 @@ $^{28}$Si~\cite{SobottkaWills.1968}. The baseline design for the proton
absorber is 0.5~\si{\milli\meter}-thick CFRP, making the total thickness absorber is 0.5~\si{\milli\meter}-thick CFRP, making the total thickness
of material before the sensitive region is \SI{1.0}{\mm} in CFRP. In this of material before the sensitive region is \SI{1.0}{\mm} in CFRP. In this
configuration, the inner wall and the proton absorber contribute a spread of configuration, the inner wall and the proton absorber contribute a spread of
\SI{167}{\keV\per\cc} to the momentum of a \mueconv signal electron. This \SI{167}{\keV\per\hepclight} to the momentum of a \mueconv signal electron. This
figure is a little below the spread cause by multiple scatterings on the figure is a little below the spread cause by multiple scatterings on the
chamber gas at \SI{197}{\keV\per\cc}. chamber gas at \SI{197}{\keV\per\hepclight}.
The impact of the proton absorber on the CDC's hit rate and momentum The impact of the proton absorber on the CDC's hit rate and momentum
resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}. resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
\begin{table}[htb] \begin{table}[htb]
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
\textbf{Absorber }& \textbf{Total CFRP }&\textbf{Proton }& \textbf{Absorber }& \textbf{Total CFRP }&\textbf{Proton }&
\textbf{$\Delta p$}\\ \textbf{$\Delta p$}\\
\textbf{thickness }& \textbf{thickness }&\textbf{hit rate }& \\ \textbf{thickness }& \textbf{thickness }&\textbf{hit rate }& \\
(\si{\mm}) &(\si{\mm}) & (\si{\kHz}) & (\si{\keV\per\cc}) \\ (\si{\mm}) &(\si{\mm}) & (\si{\kHz}) & (\si{\keV\per\hepclight}) \\
\midrule \midrule
0 & 0.5 & 130 & 131 \\ 0 & 0.5 & 130 & 131 \\
0.5 & 1.0 & 34 & 167 \\ 0.5 & 1.0 & 34 & 167 \\
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
\end{center} \end{center}
\caption{Hit rates and contributions to momentum spread of the proton \caption{Hit rates and contributions to momentum spread of the proton
absorber and inner wall of the CDC. The resolutions are calculated for absorber and inner wall of the CDC. The resolutions are calculated for
mono-energetic electrons of \SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\cc}.} mono-energetic electrons of \SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.}
\label{tab:comet_absorber_impact} \label{tab:comet_absorber_impact}
\end{table} \end{table}

View File

@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ A spectrum shape at this energy range is not available.
\label{sub:motivation_of_the_alcap_experiment} \label{sub:motivation_of_the_alcap_experiment}
As mentioned, protons from muon capture on aluminium might cause a very high As mentioned, protons from muon capture on aluminium might cause a very high
rate in the COMET Phase-I CDC. The detector is designed to accept particles rate in the COMET Phase-I CDC. The detector is designed to accept particles
with momenta in the range of \SIrange{75}{120}{\MeV\per\cc}. with momenta in the range of \SIrange{75}{120}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.
\cref{fig:proton_impact_CDC} shows that protons with kinetic energies larger \cref{fig:proton_impact_CDC} shows that protons with kinetic energies larger
than \SI{2.5}{\MeV} could hit the CDC. Such events are troublesome due to than \SI{2.5}{\MeV} could hit the CDC. Such events are troublesome due to
their large energy deposition. Deuterons and alphas at the same momentum are their large energy deposition. Deuterons and alphas at the same momentum are

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ scintillators for neutron measurements were also tested in this run.
Muons in the $\pi$E1 beam line are decay products of pions created Muons in the $\pi$E1 beam line are decay products of pions created
as a \SI{590}{\mega\electronvolt} proton beam hits a thick carbon target. The as a \SI{590}{\mega\electronvolt} proton beam hits a thick carbon target. The
beam line was designed to deliver muons with momenta ranging from beam line was designed to deliver muons with momenta ranging from
\SIrange{10}{500}{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} and momentum spread from \SIrange{10}{500}{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} and momentum spread from
\SIrange{0.26}{8.0}{\percent}~\cite{Foroughli.1997}. The beam parameters can \SIrange{0.26}{8.0}{\percent}~\cite{Foroughli.1997}. The beam parameters can
be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line. be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line.
%These parameters can be %These parameters can be
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line.
One of the main requirements of the AlCap experiment was a low energy muon beam One of the main requirements of the AlCap experiment was a low energy muon beam
with narrow momentum bite in order to achieve a high fraction of stopping muons with narrow momentum bite in order to achieve a high fraction of stopping muons
in the very thin targets. In this Run 2013, muons from in the very thin targets. In this Run 2013, muons from
\SIrange{28}{45}{\MeV\per\cc} and momentum spread of 1\% and \SIrange{28}{45}{\MeV\per\hepclight} and momentum spread of 1\% and
3\% were used. 3\% were used.
For part of the experiment the target was replaced with one of the silicon For part of the experiment the target was replaced with one of the silicon
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ at X-rays of interest are listed in \cref{tab:xray_eff}.
%\label{sub:muon_momentum_scanning} %\label{sub:muon_momentum_scanning}
%Before taking any data, we carried out the muon momentum scanning to understand %Before taking any data, we carried out the muon momentum scanning to understand
%the muon beam, as well as calibrate the detector system. The nominal muon %the muon beam, as well as calibrate the detector system. The nominal muon
%momentum used in the Run 2013 had been tuned to 28~MeV\cc\ before the run. By %momentum used in the Run 2013 had been tuned to 28~MeV\hepclight\ before the run. By
%changing simultaneously the strength of the key magnet elements in the $\pi$E1 %changing simultaneously the strength of the key magnet elements in the $\pi$E1
%beam line with the same factor, the muon beam momentum would be scaled with the %beam line with the same factor, the muon beam momentum would be scaled with the
%same factor. %same factor.
@@ -712,8 +712,8 @@ at X-rays of interest are listed in \cref{tab:xray_eff}.
%\toprule %\toprule
%\textbf{Scaling} & \textbf{Momentum} & \textbf{Kinetic energy} %\textbf{Scaling} & \textbf{Momentum} & \textbf{Kinetic energy}
%& \textbf{Momentum spread}\\ %& \textbf{Momentum spread}\\
%\textbf{factor} & \textbf{(MeV\per\cc)} & \textbf{(MeV)} %\textbf{factor} & \textbf{(MeV\per\hepclight)} & \textbf{(MeV)}
%& \textbf{(MeV\per\cc, 3\% FWHM)}\\ %& \textbf{(MeV\per\hepclight, 3\% FWHM)}\\
%\midrule %\midrule
%1.03 & 28.84 & 3.87& 0.87\\ %1.03 & 28.84 & 3.87& 0.87\\
%1.05 & 29.40 & 4.01& 0.88\\ %1.05 & 29.40 & 4.01& 0.88\\
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ sets are shown in \cref{tb:stat}.
\end{tabular} \end{tabular}
\end{center} \end{center}
\caption{Run statistics. Momentum scaling factors are normalised to \caption{Run statistics. Momentum scaling factors are normalised to
\SI{28}{\MeV\per\cc}.} \SI{28}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.}
\label{tb:stat} \label{tb:stat}
\end{table} \end{table}

View File

@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ In this analysis, a subset of runs from \numrange{2808}{2873} with the
\item a thicker target gives better statistics because of a higher \item a thicker target gives better statistics because of a higher
muon rate available at a higher momentum and less scattering. muon rate available at a higher momentum and less scattering.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
Muons with momentum of \SI{30.52}{\MeV\per\cc}, 3\%-FWHM spread (scaling factor of Muons with momentum of \SI{30.52}{\MeV\per\hepclight}, 3\%-FWHM spread (scaling factor of
1.09, normalised to \SI{28}{\MeV\per\cc}) were used for this target after 1.09, normalised to \SI{28}{\MeV\per\hepclight}) were used for this target after
a momentum scanning as described in the next subsection. a momentum scanning as described in the next subsection.
\subsection{Momentum scan for the 100-\si{\um} aluminium target} \subsection{Momentum scan for the 100-\si{\um} aluminium target}
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ in \cref{tab:al100_scan}.
\begin{center} \begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cccc} \begin{tabular}{cccc}
\toprule \toprule
\textbf{Momentum (\si{\MeV\per\cc})} & \textbf{Scaling factor} & \textbf{Runs} \textbf{Momentum (\si{\MeV\per\hepclight})} & \textbf{Scaling factor} & \textbf{Runs}
& \textbf{Length (s)}\\ & \textbf{Length (s)}\\
\midrule \midrule
29.12 & 1.04 & \numrange{2609}{2613} &2299\\ 29.12 & 1.04 & \numrange{2609}{2613} &2299\\

View File

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ different absorber configurations are listed in
%\toprule %\toprule
%{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\ %{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\
%{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\ %{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
%{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\ %{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\hepclight)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
%\midrule %\midrule
%1 &0.5&1.5 & 2 & 195 & 25\\ %1 &0.5&1.5 & 2 & 195 & 25\\
%0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126 & 167 & 60\\ %0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126 & 167 & 60\\
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ Therefore the absorber is not necessary as far as the hit rate is concerned.
%absorber is not needed for the COMET Phase I's CDC. %absorber is not needed for the COMET Phase I's CDC.
If the proton absorber is not used, the momentum spread of the signal electron If the proton absorber is not used, the momentum spread of the signal electron
reduces from \SI{167}{\keV\per\cc} to \SI{131}{\keV\per\cc} (\cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}). reduces from \SI{167}{\keV\per\hepclight} to \SI{131}{\keV\per\hepclight} (\cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}).
This is a small improvement since the momentum resolution is dominated by This is a small improvement since the momentum resolution is dominated by
intrinsic spread of \SI{197}{\keV\per\cc} due to multiple scattering in gas intrinsic spread of \SI{197}{\keV\per\hepclight} due to multiple scattering in gas
and wires. and wires.
The last column of \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} shows the integrated charge The last column of \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} shows the integrated charge
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ absorber will not worsen the ageing process of the wires.
{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}&
{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\ {\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})}
& {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\ & {(\si{\keV\per\hepclight)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
\midrule \midrule
1 &0.5&1.5 & 195 & 25\\ 1 &0.5&1.5 & 195 & 25\\
0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 167 & 60\\ 0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 167 & 60\\
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ absorber will not worsen the ageing process of the wires.
\caption{Momentum spreads due to the inner wall and absorber, and integrated \caption{Momentum spreads due to the inner wall and absorber, and integrated
charge per unit length of wire as calculated in the COMET Phase-I's TDR. charge per unit length of wire as calculated in the COMET Phase-I's TDR.
The momentum spreads were calculated for signal electrons at The momentum spreads were calculated for signal electrons at
\SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\cc}. The integrated charge is estimated assuming 300 \SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\hepclight}. The integrated charge is estimated assuming 300
days of operation.} days of operation.}
\label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} \label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}
\end{table} \end{table}

View File

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ bookmarks
%% Units %% Units
%\RequirePackage[]{siunitx} %\RequirePackage[]{siunitx}
\RequirePackage[detect-weight=true, detect-family=true]{siunitx} \RequirePackage[detect-weight=true, detect-family=true]{siunitx}
\DeclareSIUnit \hepclight { \text { \ensuremath { c } } }
\RequirePackage{hepnames} \RequirePackage{hepnames}
\RequirePackage{array} \RequirePackage{array}
%% Various fonts ... %% Various fonts ...

View File

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
}{} }{}
\makeatother \makeatother
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.13}
\title{A study of proton emission\\ \title{A study of proton emission\\
\vspace{-7mm} %%ad-hoc hack to get the spacing roughly right \vspace{-7mm} %%ad-hoc hack to get the spacing roughly right
following nuclear muon capture\\ following nuclear muon capture\\
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ for the COMET experiment}
\end{frontmatter} \end{frontmatter}
\mainmatter \mainmatter
%%%\input{chapters/chap1_intro} \input{chapters/chap1_intro}
\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv} \input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv}
\input{chapters/chap3_comet} \input{chapters/chap3_comet}
\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys} \input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys}