new unit for speed of light
This commit is contained in:
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ to reduce the radiative pion capture and other prompt backgrounds. Cosmic
|
|||||||
backgrounds are
|
backgrounds are
|
||||||
rejected using a combination of
|
rejected using a combination of
|
||||||
passive shielding, veto counters and reconstruction cuts. The momenta of beam
|
passive shielding, veto counters and reconstruction cuts. The momenta of beam
|
||||||
muons used in the experiment were \SI{52}{\MeV\per\cc} and
|
muons used in the experiment were \SI{52}{\MeV\per\hepclight} and
|
||||||
\SI{53}{\MeV\per\cc}, and the momentum spread was 2\%.
|
\SI{53}{\MeV\per\hepclight}, and the momentum spread was 2\%.
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[htbp] \centering
|
\begin{figure}[htbp] \centering
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figs/sindrumII_setup}
|
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figs/sindrumII_setup}
|
||||||
\caption{SINDRUM-II experimental set up, reprinted from
|
\caption{SINDRUM-II experimental set up, reprinted from
|
||||||
@@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ transport section.
|
|||||||
The \ang{180} bending electron transport solenoids help remove line-of-sight
|
The \ang{180} bending electron transport solenoids help remove line-of-sight
|
||||||
between the target and the detector system. It works similarly to the muon
|
between the target and the detector system. It works similarly to the muon
|
||||||
transportation section, but is tuned differently to accept electrons of about
|
transportation section, but is tuned differently to accept electrons of about
|
||||||
\SI{105}{\MeV\per\cc}. A compensation field of \SI{0.17}{\tesla} along the
|
\SI{105}{\MeV\per\hepclight}. A compensation field of \SI{0.17}{\tesla} along the
|
||||||
vertical direction will be applied. Electrons with momentum less than
|
vertical direction will be applied. Electrons with momentum less than
|
||||||
\SI{80}{\MeV\per\cc} are blocked at the exit of this section by
|
\SI{80}{\MeV\per\hepclight} are blocked at the exit of this section by
|
||||||
a collimator to reduce DIO electrons rate. The net acceptance of signals of
|
a collimator to reduce DIO electrons rate. The net acceptance of signals of
|
||||||
\mueconv is about 0.32, and the detector hit rate will be in the order of
|
\mueconv is about 0.32, and the detector hit rate will be in the order of
|
||||||
\SI{1}{\kHz} for a muon stopping rate of \SI{E11}{\Hz}.
|
\SI{1}{\kHz} for a muon stopping rate of \SI{E11}{\Hz}.
|
||||||
@@ -429,12 +429,12 @@ active shielding against cosmic rays is considered.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The tracking detector has to provide a momentum resolution less than
|
The tracking detector has to provide a momentum resolution less than
|
||||||
%%TODO 350 or 150?
|
%%TODO 350 or 150?
|
||||||
350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} in order to achieve a sensitivity of
|
350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} in order to achieve a sensitivity of
|
||||||
\sn{3}{-17}. There are five stations of straw-tube gas chambers, each provides
|
\sn{3}{-17}. There are five stations of straw-tube gas chambers, each provides
|
||||||
two dimensional information. Each straw tube is 5~\si{\milli\meter} in diameter
|
two dimensional information. Each straw tube is 5~\si{\milli\meter} in diameter
|
||||||
and has a 25-\si{\micro\meter}-thick wall. According to a GEANT4 Monte Carlo
|
and has a 25-\si{\micro\meter}-thick wall. According to a GEANT4 Monte Carlo
|
||||||
simulation, a position resolution of 250~\si{\micro\meter} can be obtained,
|
simulation, a position resolution of 250~\si{\micro\meter} can be obtained,
|
||||||
which is enough for 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} momentum resolution. The
|
which is enough for 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} momentum resolution. The
|
||||||
DIO background of 0.15 events is expected.
|
DIO background of 0.15 events is expected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The electromagnetic calorimeter serves three purposes: a) to measure electrons
|
The electromagnetic calorimeter serves three purposes: a) to measure electrons
|
||||||
@@ -450,11 +450,11 @@ hit positions. Two candidate crystals, GSO and LYSO, are under consideration.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The requirements for \mueconv signals are:
|
The requirements for \mueconv signals are:
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item from the 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc}~momentum resolution, the signal
|
\item from the 350~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight}~momentum resolution, the signal
|
||||||
region is determined to be 103.5~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc}~to
|
region is determined to be 103.5~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight}~to
|
||||||
105.2~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc};
|
105.2~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight};
|
||||||
\item transversal momentum of signal electrons is required to be greater than
|
\item transversal momentum of signal electrons is required to be greater than
|
||||||
52~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} to remove backgrounds from beam electrons and
|
52~\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} to remove backgrounds from beam electrons and
|
||||||
muons decay in flight;
|
muons decay in flight;
|
||||||
\item timing wise, conversion electrons should arrive in the time window of
|
\item timing wise, conversion electrons should arrive in the time window of
|
||||||
detection which is about 700~\si{\nano\second}~after each proton pulses
|
detection which is about 700~\si{\nano\second}~after each proton pulses
|
||||||
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ avalanche gain of
|
|||||||
approximately \sn{4}{4}. A gas mixture of helium:isobutane(90:10) is preferred
|
approximately \sn{4}{4}. A gas mixture of helium:isobutane(90:10) is preferred
|
||||||
since the CDC momentum resolution is dominated by multiple scattering. With
|
since the CDC momentum resolution is dominated by multiple scattering. With
|
||||||
these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of
|
these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of
|
||||||
197~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\cc} is achievable according to our tracking study.
|
197~\si{\kilo\electronvolt\per\hepclight} is achievable according to our tracking study.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{table}[htb]
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
||||||
\begin{center}
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ these configurations, an intrinsic momentum resolution of
|
|||||||
\label{ssub:hit_rate_on_the_cdc}
|
\label{ssub:hit_rate_on_the_cdc}
|
||||||
The maximal usable muon beam intensity will be limited by the detector hit
|
The maximal usable muon beam intensity will be limited by the detector hit
|
||||||
occupancy. Charge particles with transversal momentum greater than 70
|
occupancy. Charge particles with transversal momentum greater than 70
|
||||||
\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} are expected to reach the CDC. Those include:
|
\si{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} are expected to reach the CDC. Those include:
|
||||||
protons emitted from nuclear muon capture, and electrons from muon decay in
|
protons emitted from nuclear muon capture, and electrons from muon decay in
|
||||||
orbit (DIO). It is calculated that the hit rate due to proton emission dominates,
|
orbit (DIO). It is calculated that the hit rate due to proton emission dominates,
|
||||||
where the highest rate is \SI{11}{\kHz\per}cell compares to
|
where the highest rate is \SI{11}{\kHz\per}cell compares to
|
||||||
@@ -733,9 +733,9 @@ $^{28}$Si~\cite{SobottkaWills.1968}. The baseline design for the proton
|
|||||||
absorber is 0.5~\si{\milli\meter}-thick CFRP, making the total thickness
|
absorber is 0.5~\si{\milli\meter}-thick CFRP, making the total thickness
|
||||||
of material before the sensitive region is \SI{1.0}{\mm} in CFRP. In this
|
of material before the sensitive region is \SI{1.0}{\mm} in CFRP. In this
|
||||||
configuration, the inner wall and the proton absorber contribute a spread of
|
configuration, the inner wall and the proton absorber contribute a spread of
|
||||||
\SI{167}{\keV\per\cc} to the momentum of a \mueconv signal electron. This
|
\SI{167}{\keV\per\hepclight} to the momentum of a \mueconv signal electron. This
|
||||||
figure is a little below the spread cause by multiple scatterings on the
|
figure is a little below the spread cause by multiple scatterings on the
|
||||||
chamber gas at \SI{197}{\keV\per\cc}.
|
chamber gas at \SI{197}{\keV\per\hepclight}.
|
||||||
The impact of the proton absorber on the CDC's hit rate and momentum
|
The impact of the proton absorber on the CDC's hit rate and momentum
|
||||||
resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
|
resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
|
||||||
\begin{table}[htb]
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
||||||
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
|
|||||||
\textbf{Absorber }& \textbf{Total CFRP }&\textbf{Proton }&
|
\textbf{Absorber }& \textbf{Total CFRP }&\textbf{Proton }&
|
||||||
\textbf{$\Delta p$}\\
|
\textbf{$\Delta p$}\\
|
||||||
\textbf{thickness }& \textbf{thickness }&\textbf{hit rate }& \\
|
\textbf{thickness }& \textbf{thickness }&\textbf{hit rate }& \\
|
||||||
(\si{\mm}) &(\si{\mm}) & (\si{\kHz}) & (\si{\keV\per\cc}) \\
|
(\si{\mm}) &(\si{\mm}) & (\si{\kHz}) & (\si{\keV\per\hepclight}) \\
|
||||||
\midrule
|
\midrule
|
||||||
0 & 0.5 & 130 & 131 \\
|
0 & 0.5 & 130 & 131 \\
|
||||||
0.5 & 1.0 & 34 & 167 \\
|
0.5 & 1.0 & 34 & 167 \\
|
||||||
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ resolution is summarised in \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.
|
|||||||
\end{center}
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
\caption{Hit rates and contributions to momentum spread of the proton
|
\caption{Hit rates and contributions to momentum spread of the proton
|
||||||
absorber and inner wall of the CDC. The resolutions are calculated for
|
absorber and inner wall of the CDC. The resolutions are calculated for
|
||||||
mono-energetic electrons of \SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\cc}.}
|
mono-energetic electrons of \SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.}
|
||||||
\label{tab:comet_absorber_impact}
|
\label{tab:comet_absorber_impact}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ A spectrum shape at this energy range is not available.
|
|||||||
\label{sub:motivation_of_the_alcap_experiment}
|
\label{sub:motivation_of_the_alcap_experiment}
|
||||||
As mentioned, protons from muon capture on aluminium might cause a very high
|
As mentioned, protons from muon capture on aluminium might cause a very high
|
||||||
rate in the COMET Phase-I CDC. The detector is designed to accept particles
|
rate in the COMET Phase-I CDC. The detector is designed to accept particles
|
||||||
with momenta in the range of \SIrange{75}{120}{\MeV\per\cc}.
|
with momenta in the range of \SIrange{75}{120}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.
|
||||||
\cref{fig:proton_impact_CDC} shows that protons with kinetic energies larger
|
\cref{fig:proton_impact_CDC} shows that protons with kinetic energies larger
|
||||||
than \SI{2.5}{\MeV} could hit the CDC. Such events are troublesome due to
|
than \SI{2.5}{\MeV} could hit the CDC. Such events are troublesome due to
|
||||||
their large energy deposition. Deuterons and alphas at the same momentum are
|
their large energy deposition. Deuterons and alphas at the same momentum are
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ scintillators for neutron measurements were also tested in this run.
|
|||||||
Muons in the $\pi$E1 beam line are decay products of pions created
|
Muons in the $\pi$E1 beam line are decay products of pions created
|
||||||
as a \SI{590}{\mega\electronvolt} proton beam hits a thick carbon target. The
|
as a \SI{590}{\mega\electronvolt} proton beam hits a thick carbon target. The
|
||||||
beam line was designed to deliver muons with momenta ranging from
|
beam line was designed to deliver muons with momenta ranging from
|
||||||
\SIrange{10}{500}{\mega\electronvolt\per\cc} and momentum spread from
|
\SIrange{10}{500}{\mega\electronvolt\per\hepclight} and momentum spread from
|
||||||
\SIrange{0.26}{8.0}{\percent}~\cite{Foroughli.1997}. The beam parameters can
|
\SIrange{0.26}{8.0}{\percent}~\cite{Foroughli.1997}. The beam parameters can
|
||||||
be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line.
|
be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line.
|
||||||
%These parameters can be
|
%These parameters can be
|
||||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ be tuned by adjusting magnets and slits along the beam line.
|
|||||||
One of the main requirements of the AlCap experiment was a low energy muon beam
|
One of the main requirements of the AlCap experiment was a low energy muon beam
|
||||||
with narrow momentum bite in order to achieve a high fraction of stopping muons
|
with narrow momentum bite in order to achieve a high fraction of stopping muons
|
||||||
in the very thin targets. In this Run 2013, muons from
|
in the very thin targets. In this Run 2013, muons from
|
||||||
\SIrange{28}{45}{\MeV\per\cc} and momentum spread of 1\% and
|
\SIrange{28}{45}{\MeV\per\hepclight} and momentum spread of 1\% and
|
||||||
3\% were used.
|
3\% were used.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For part of the experiment the target was replaced with one of the silicon
|
For part of the experiment the target was replaced with one of the silicon
|
||||||
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ at X-rays of interest are listed in \cref{tab:xray_eff}.
|
|||||||
%\label{sub:muon_momentum_scanning}
|
%\label{sub:muon_momentum_scanning}
|
||||||
%Before taking any data, we carried out the muon momentum scanning to understand
|
%Before taking any data, we carried out the muon momentum scanning to understand
|
||||||
%the muon beam, as well as calibrate the detector system. The nominal muon
|
%the muon beam, as well as calibrate the detector system. The nominal muon
|
||||||
%momentum used in the Run 2013 had been tuned to 28~MeV\cc\ before the run. By
|
%momentum used in the Run 2013 had been tuned to 28~MeV\hepclight\ before the run. By
|
||||||
%changing simultaneously the strength of the key magnet elements in the $\pi$E1
|
%changing simultaneously the strength of the key magnet elements in the $\pi$E1
|
||||||
%beam line with the same factor, the muon beam momentum would be scaled with the
|
%beam line with the same factor, the muon beam momentum would be scaled with the
|
||||||
%same factor.
|
%same factor.
|
||||||
@@ -712,8 +712,8 @@ at X-rays of interest are listed in \cref{tab:xray_eff}.
|
|||||||
%\toprule
|
%\toprule
|
||||||
%\textbf{Scaling} & \textbf{Momentum} & \textbf{Kinetic energy}
|
%\textbf{Scaling} & \textbf{Momentum} & \textbf{Kinetic energy}
|
||||||
%& \textbf{Momentum spread}\\
|
%& \textbf{Momentum spread}\\
|
||||||
%\textbf{factor} & \textbf{(MeV\per\cc)} & \textbf{(MeV)}
|
%\textbf{factor} & \textbf{(MeV\per\hepclight)} & \textbf{(MeV)}
|
||||||
%& \textbf{(MeV\per\cc, 3\% FWHM)}\\
|
%& \textbf{(MeV\per\hepclight, 3\% FWHM)}\\
|
||||||
%\midrule
|
%\midrule
|
||||||
%1.03 & 28.84 & 3.87& 0.87\\
|
%1.03 & 28.84 & 3.87& 0.87\\
|
||||||
%1.05 & 29.40 & 4.01& 0.88\\
|
%1.05 & 29.40 & 4.01& 0.88\\
|
||||||
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ sets are shown in \cref{tb:stat}.
|
|||||||
\end{tabular}
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
\end{center}
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
\caption{Run statistics. Momentum scaling factors are normalised to
|
\caption{Run statistics. Momentum scaling factors are normalised to
|
||||||
\SI{28}{\MeV\per\cc}.}
|
\SI{28}{\MeV\per\hepclight}.}
|
||||||
\label{tb:stat}
|
\label{tb:stat}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ In this analysis, a subset of runs from \numrange{2808}{2873} with the
|
|||||||
\item a thicker target gives better statistics because of a higher
|
\item a thicker target gives better statistics because of a higher
|
||||||
muon rate available at a higher momentum and less scattering.
|
muon rate available at a higher momentum and less scattering.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
Muons with momentum of \SI{30.52}{\MeV\per\cc}, 3\%-FWHM spread (scaling factor of
|
Muons with momentum of \SI{30.52}{\MeV\per\hepclight}, 3\%-FWHM spread (scaling factor of
|
||||||
1.09, normalised to \SI{28}{\MeV\per\cc}) were used for this target after
|
1.09, normalised to \SI{28}{\MeV\per\hepclight}) were used for this target after
|
||||||
a momentum scanning as described in the next subsection.
|
a momentum scanning as described in the next subsection.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Momentum scan for the 100-\si{\um} aluminium target}
|
\subsection{Momentum scan for the 100-\si{\um} aluminium target}
|
||||||
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ in \cref{tab:al100_scan}.
|
|||||||
\begin{center}
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
|
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
|
||||||
\toprule
|
\toprule
|
||||||
\textbf{Momentum (\si{\MeV\per\cc})} & \textbf{Scaling factor} & \textbf{Runs}
|
\textbf{Momentum (\si{\MeV\per\hepclight})} & \textbf{Scaling factor} & \textbf{Runs}
|
||||||
& \textbf{Length (s)}\\
|
& \textbf{Length (s)}\\
|
||||||
\midrule
|
\midrule
|
||||||
29.12 & 1.04 & \numrange{2609}{2613} &2299\\
|
29.12 & 1.04 & \numrange{2609}{2613} &2299\\
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ different absorber configurations are listed in
|
|||||||
%\toprule
|
%\toprule
|
||||||
%{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\
|
%{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\
|
||||||
%{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
|
%{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
|
||||||
%{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
|
%{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\hepclight)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
|
||||||
%\midrule
|
%\midrule
|
||||||
%1 &0.5&1.5 & 2 & 195 & 25\\
|
%1 &0.5&1.5 & 2 & 195 & 25\\
|
||||||
%0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126 & 167 & 60\\
|
%0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126 & 167 & 60\\
|
||||||
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ Therefore the absorber is not necessary as far as the hit rate is concerned.
|
|||||||
%absorber is not needed for the COMET Phase I's CDC.
|
%absorber is not needed for the COMET Phase I's CDC.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the proton absorber is not used, the momentum spread of the signal electron
|
If the proton absorber is not used, the momentum spread of the signal electron
|
||||||
reduces from \SI{167}{\keV\per\cc} to \SI{131}{\keV\per\cc} (\cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}).
|
reduces from \SI{167}{\keV\per\hepclight} to \SI{131}{\keV\per\hepclight} (\cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}).
|
||||||
This is a small improvement since the momentum resolution is dominated by
|
This is a small improvement since the momentum resolution is dominated by
|
||||||
intrinsic spread of \SI{197}{\keV\per\cc} due to multiple scattering in gas
|
intrinsic spread of \SI{197}{\keV\per\hepclight} due to multiple scattering in gas
|
||||||
and wires.
|
and wires.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The last column of \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} shows the integrated charge
|
The last column of \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} shows the integrated charge
|
||||||
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ absorber will not worsen the ageing process of the wires.
|
|||||||
{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}&
|
{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}&
|
||||||
{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
|
{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
|
||||||
{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})}
|
{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})}
|
||||||
& {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
|
& {(\si{\keV\per\hepclight)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
|
||||||
\midrule
|
\midrule
|
||||||
1 &0.5&1.5 & 195 & 25\\
|
1 &0.5&1.5 & 195 & 25\\
|
||||||
0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 167 & 60\\
|
0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 167 & 60\\
|
||||||
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ absorber will not worsen the ageing process of the wires.
|
|||||||
\caption{Momentum spreads due to the inner wall and absorber, and integrated
|
\caption{Momentum spreads due to the inner wall and absorber, and integrated
|
||||||
charge per unit length of wire as calculated in the COMET Phase-I's TDR.
|
charge per unit length of wire as calculated in the COMET Phase-I's TDR.
|
||||||
The momentum spreads were calculated for signal electrons at
|
The momentum spreads were calculated for signal electrons at
|
||||||
\SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\cc}. The integrated charge is estimated assuming 300
|
\SI{104.96}{\MeV\per\hepclight}. The integrated charge is estimated assuming 300
|
||||||
days of operation.}
|
days of operation.}
|
||||||
\label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}
|
\label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ bookmarks
|
|||||||
%% Units
|
%% Units
|
||||||
%\RequirePackage[]{siunitx}
|
%\RequirePackage[]{siunitx}
|
||||||
\RequirePackage[detect-weight=true, detect-family=true]{siunitx}
|
\RequirePackage[detect-weight=true, detect-family=true]{siunitx}
|
||||||
|
\DeclareSIUnit \hepclight { \text { \ensuremath { c } } }
|
||||||
\RequirePackage{hepnames}
|
\RequirePackage{hepnames}
|
||||||
\RequirePackage{array}
|
\RequirePackage{array}
|
||||||
%% Various fonts ...
|
%% Various fonts ...
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
|
|||||||
}{}
|
}{}
|
||||||
\makeatother
|
\makeatother
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.13}
|
||||||
\title{A study of proton emission\\
|
\title{A study of proton emission\\
|
||||||
\vspace{-7mm} %%ad-hoc hack to get the spacing roughly right
|
\vspace{-7mm} %%ad-hoc hack to get the spacing roughly right
|
||||||
following nuclear muon capture\\
|
following nuclear muon capture\\
|
||||||
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ for the COMET experiment}
|
|||||||
\end{frontmatter}
|
\end{frontmatter}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\mainmatter
|
\mainmatter
|
||||||
%%%\input{chapters/chap1_intro}
|
\input{chapters/chap1_intro}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv}
|
\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap3_comet}
|
\input{chapters/chap3_comet}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys}
|
\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user