various fixes

thesis/chapters/chap7_results.tex

@@ -80,6 +80,46 @@ different absorber thickness are shown in \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}.
   \label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}
 \end{table}
 
+%\begin{table}[htb]
+  %\begin{center}
+    %\begin{tabular}{S S S S S}
+      %\toprule
+      %{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}&
+      %{\textbf{Proton hit rate}} & {\textbf{Proton hit rate}}\\  
+      %{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}&
+      %{\textbf{Phase-I TDR}} & {\textbf{New estimation}}\\
+      %{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})}& {(\si{\Hz})}\\
+      %\midrule 
+      %1   &0.5&1.5 & 4E+3 & 2     \\
+      %0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 11E+3& 126   \\
+      %0   &0.5&0.5 & 30E+3& 1436 \\
+      %\bottomrule
+    %\end{tabular}
+  %\end{center}
+  %\caption{CDC proton hit rates at different configuration of proton absorber
+    %and inner wall. The momentum spreads for \SI{0.5}{\mm} thick inner wall are
+    %taken from \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.}
+  %\label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}
+%\end{table}
+
+%\begin{table}[htb]
+  %\begin{center}
+    %\begin{tabular}{S S S S S S}
+      %\toprule
+      %{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\
+      %{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\
+      %{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\
+      %\midrule 
+      %1   &0.5&1.5 & 2    & 195 & 25\\
+      %0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126  & 167 & 60\\
+      %0   &0.5&0.5 & 1436 & 133 & 160\\
+      %\bottomrule
+    %\end{tabular}
+  %\end{center}
+  %\caption{CDC proton hit rates at different configuration of proton absorber
+    %and inner wall. The momentum spreads for \SI{0.5}{\mm} thick inner wall are
+    %taken from \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.}
+%\end{table}
 At the baseline design of \SI{0.5}{\mm}, the hit rate is only \SI{126}{\Hz},
 much smaller than the current estimation at \SI{34}{\kHz}. Even without the
 absorber, proton hit rate remains low at \SI{1.4}{\kHz}.