diff --git a/thesis/chapters/chap7_results.tex b/thesis/chapters/chap7_results.tex index 359d6b1..cf4fa77 100644 --- a/thesis/chapters/chap7_results.tex +++ b/thesis/chapters/chap7_results.tex @@ -80,6 +80,46 @@ different absorber thickness are shown in \cref{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate}. \label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} \end{table} +%\begin{table}[htb] + %\begin{center} + %\begin{tabular}{S S S S S} + %\toprule + %{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& + %{\textbf{Proton hit rate}} & {\textbf{Proton hit rate}}\\ + %{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& + %{\textbf{Phase-I TDR}} & {\textbf{New estimation}}\\ + %{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})}& {(\si{\Hz})}\\ + %\midrule + %1 &0.5&1.5 & 4E+3 & 2 \\ + %0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 11E+3& 126 \\ + %0 &0.5&0.5 & 30E+3& 1436 \\ + %\bottomrule + %\end{tabular} + %\end{center} + %\caption{CDC proton hit rates at different configuration of proton absorber + %and inner wall. The momentum spreads for \SI{0.5}{\mm} thick inner wall are + %taken from \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.} + %\label{tab:proton_cdc_hitrate} +%\end{table} + +%\begin{table}[htb] + %\begin{center} + %\begin{tabular}{S S S S S S} + %\toprule + %{\textbf{Absorber}} &{\textbf{Inner wall}} & {\textbf{Total CFRP}}& {\textbf{Proton}} & {\textbf{Momentum}} & {\textbf{Integrated charge}}\\ + %{\textbf{thickness}} &{\textbf{thickness}} & {\textbf{thickness}}& {\textbf{hit rate}} &{\textbf{spread $\Delta p$}} &{\textbf{300 days}}\\ + %{(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\mm})} & {(\si{\Hz})} & {(\si{\keV\per\cc)}} &{(mC/cm)}\\ + %\midrule + %1 &0.5&1.5 & 2 & 195 & 25\\ + %0.5 &0.5&1.0 & 126 & 167 & 60\\ + %0 &0.5&0.5 & 1436 & 133 & 160\\ + %\bottomrule + %\end{tabular} + %\end{center} + %\caption{CDC proton hit rates at different configuration of proton absorber + %and inner wall. The momentum spreads for \SI{0.5}{\mm} thick inner wall are + %taken from \cref{tab:comet_absorber_impact}.} +%\end{table} At the baseline design of \SI{0.5}{\mm}, the hit rate is only \SI{126}{\Hz}, much smaller than the current estimation at \SI{34}{\kHz}. Even without the absorber, proton hit rate remains low at \SI{1.4}{\kHz}. diff --git a/thesis/figs/ge_eff_cal.pdf b/thesis/figs/ge_eff_cal.pdf index 7dd202a..33a93ea 100644 Binary files a/thesis/figs/ge_eff_cal.pdf and b/thesis/figs/ge_eff_cal.pdf differ diff --git a/thesis/thesis.tex b/thesis/thesis.tex index 7c10071..aec31ac 100644 --- a/thesis/thesis.tex +++ b/thesis/thesis.tex @@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ for the COMET experiment} \mainmatter %%%\input{chapters/chap1_intro} -%\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv} -%\input{chapters/chap3_comet} -%\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys} -%\input{chapters/chap5_alcap_setup} +\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv} +\input{chapters/chap3_comet} +\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys} +\input{chapters/chap5_alcap_setup} \input{chapters/chap6_analysis} \input{chapters/chap7_results} -%\input{chapters/chap8_conclusions} +\input{chapters/chap8_conclusions} \begin{backmatter} \input{chapters/backmatter}