add progress14
This commit is contained in:
124
progress14/AnalysisFramework.tex
Normal file
124
progress14/AnalysisFramework.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
||||
%\subsubsection{plan}
|
||||
%\begin{itemize}
|
||||
%\item two stage: alcapana then rootana
|
||||
%\item alcapana is online analysis as well as primary midas -> root conversion
|
||||
%\item rootana is the main offline analysis
|
||||
%\item Waveform Analysis
|
||||
%\begin{itemize}
|
||||
%\item Pulse Candidate Finder
|
||||
%\item Amplitude: MaxBin
|
||||
%\item Timing: Constant Fraction
|
||||
%\item Calibration: Timing offsets, Pedestals, Energy scales
|
||||
%\end{itemize}
|
||||
%\item Event Correlating: Fast and Slow coincidence
|
||||
%\item Event Correlating: Muon events
|
||||
%\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{figs/WaveformAnalysis.png}
|
||||
\caption{Illustration of the waveform analysis techniques used in Rootana.}
|
||||
\label{fig:waveform_reco_demo}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%The analaysis of the Alcap data is split between two main stages, known as
|
||||
%Alcapana and Rootana.
|
||||
The AlCap DAQ delivers data as compressed MIDAS files. These are then
|
||||
handled in two stages. In the first stage (Alcapana),
|
||||
some preliminary analysis is
|
||||
performed and the MIDAS files unpacked into a ROOT format. These are then
|
||||
passed through the second stage (Rootana) for physics analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Alcapana}
|
||||
The MIDAS files produced by the DAQ contain both the digitised
|
||||
waveform outputs
|
||||
and the run-time DAQ configuration. Alcapana is the first point in the
|
||||
processing chain to look at this data and performs two roles: 1) it
|
||||
provides some preliminary, semi-online analysis, 2) it converts the
|
||||
MIDAS data into a ROOT format.
|
||||
|
||||
The analysis produces simple histograms of quantities such as amplitude,
|
||||
timing, and pulse island length. It also creates persistency-style
|
||||
overlays of each
|
||||
waveform in the event. These histograms are placed in an output file which can
|
||||
then be loaded into a simple ROOT-based GUI where results can be displayed
|
||||
rapidly and help to understand the data quality.
|
||||
%Much of this was implemented during the run and by the end the alcapana
|
||||
%analysis and displays formed a strong and user-friendly tool-kit.
|
||||
|
||||
Since each digitiser is run in a self-trigger mode within a MIDAS block, the
|
||||
output waveforms contain, in principle, a single pulse stored as a vector of
|
||||
ADC samples. The waveform digitisers stamp each pulse with a trigger time-stamp relative to the
|
||||
start of the MIDAS block. Each of these time-stamped ADC vectors is referred
|
||||
to as a Pulse Island. Occasionally a
|
||||
real pulse may be split over two Pulse Islands. Therefore, during the
|
||||
unpacking in Alcapana Pulse Islands are with adjacent time-stamps are
|
||||
checked to concatenated into a single pulse when necessary.
|
||||
The treatment of the $\mu$PC detector is slightly different as it is readout using a discriminator and TDC, and so does not use the same waveform format for raw data.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Rootana}
|
||||
Most of the physics analysis is performed in Rootana. The framework is
|
||||
designed to be easily configured by dividing the analysis into
|
||||
modules which can be called and reconfigured at run-time through a
|
||||
configuration file. Most processing chains begin with waveform analysis so
|
||||
the module for this delegates the work to runtime selectable `generators' which
|
||||
implement the actual waveform analysis. Then the program searches for
|
||||
correlations or coincidences between different detectors in order
|
||||
to produce the final physics results.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection*{Waveform Analysis}
|
||||
The general approach to waveform analysis
|
||||
uses the following methodology:
|
||||
\begin{description}
|
||||
\item [1. Find Pulse Candidates:] Remove pulse islands which are just noise and
|
||||
divide pile-up pulses into two separate pulse islands.
|
||||
%
|
||||
%\item [2. Subtract Pedestal]
|
||||
%
|
||||
\item [2. Amplitude and Time reconstruction:] Use the Max Bin method (sometimes
|
||||
Peak Sample method) to extract the amplitude followed by a Constant Fraction Timing
|
||||
process using a linear interpolation between the two bins closest to the
|
||||
peak-sample which crosses a given fraction of the pulse's amplitude. See Fig.
|
||||
\ref{fig:waveform_reco_demo} for an illustration of these techniques.
|
||||
%
|
||||
\item [3. Apply Calibration Constants:] Account for cable delays and
|
||||
similar effects in
|
||||
the timing and convert the amplitude to energy. The constants
|
||||
are obtained from a prior data pass which calculates the timing and
|
||||
pedestal data, or from a dedicated calibration datasets in the case of energy
|
||||
constants.
|
||||
\end{description}
|
||||
|
||||
We are investigating alternative methods of waveform analysis using
|
||||
pulse-averaging in order to produce a template followed by fitting or
|
||||
convolution of the
|
||||
original waveform. Since the analysis shown below has not used these
|
||||
methods,
|
||||
they will not be described here.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection*{Pulse Correlation}
|
||||
There are two types of pulse correlation used in the analysis:
|
||||
1) correlation of
|
||||
pulses between the fast and slow filtered read-out channels of a
|
||||
single detector,
|
||||
and 2) correlation of pulses between all detectors. The first method
|
||||
provides a
|
||||
cross check on the data quality, but results in a reduction of the overall
|
||||
dynamic range of the detector since the correlation is only meaningful for
|
||||
pulses with energies within the intersection of the individual
|
||||
dynamic ranges of each channel.
|
||||
The second method is used when pulses are correlated between
|
||||
detectors. It
|
||||
is implemented
|
||||
by restructuring the dataset into what are known as ``Muon Events''. Individual
|
||||
pulses on the $\mu$Sc are used as a reference point and all pulses which occur
|
||||
within a certain time window (typically 15~\textmu s) are collected together into
|
||||
a single muon event. Should two or more $\mu$Sc pulses occur within this window,
|
||||
the event is marked as a muon pile-up event. It is then trivial to scan
|
||||
over each muon event, applying various cuts, in order to build a
|
||||
spectrum of interest.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the bulk of the correlation work is done by inspecting the timing of
|
||||
pulses on different channels, the accuracy of the time offsets due to
|
||||
cable delays is particularly important.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user