prog saved
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ spin one-half particles, called fermions: six quarks and six leptons.
|
|||||||
The six leptons form three generations (or flavours), namely:
|
The six leptons form three generations (or flavours), namely:
|
||||||
\begin{equation*}
|
\begin{equation*}
|
||||||
\binom{\nu_e}{e^-}, \quad \binom{\nu_\mu}{\mu^-} \quad \textrm{ and } \quad
|
\binom{\nu_e}{e^-}, \quad \binom{\nu_\mu}{\mu^-} \quad \textrm{ and } \quad
|
||||||
\binom{\nu_\tau}{\tau^-}
|
\binom{\nu_\tau}{\tau^-}.
|
||||||
\end{equation*}
|
\end{equation*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each lepton is assigned a lepton flavour quantum number, $L_e$, $L_\mu$,
|
Each lepton is assigned a lepton flavour quantum number, $L_e$, $L_\mu$,
|
||||||
@@ -40,15 +40,25 @@ are violated by one unit or more, is forbidden:
|
|||||||
\end{aligned}
|
\end{aligned}
|
||||||
\label{eq:mueg}
|
\label{eq:mueg}
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, it is observed that neutrinos do change flavour in the so-called
|
||||||
|
neutrino oscillations where a neutrino of a certain lepton flavour
|
||||||
|
can be measured to have a different flavour as it travels in space-time. The
|
||||||
|
phenomenon has been confirmed in many experiments with solar neutrinos,
|
||||||
|
atmospheric neutrinos, reactor neutrinos and beam neutrinos. The observation
|
||||||
|
of neutrino oscillations means that the lepton flavour is not strictly
|
||||||
|
conserved and neutrinos are massive. The massive neutrinos allow lepton
|
||||||
|
flavour violation in the charged leptons, but at an unmeasurably small level
|
||||||
|
as described in \cref{sec:lepton_flavour_violation}.
|
||||||
%One more decay?
|
%One more decay?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\hl{TODO: Why massless neutrinos help lepton flavour conservation??}
|
%\hl{TODO: Why massless neutrinos help lepton flavour conservation??}
|
||||||
%\hl{TODO: copied from KunoOkada}
|
%\hl{TODO: copied from KunoOkada}
|
||||||
%In the minimal version of the SM, where only one Higgs doublet is included and
|
%In the minimal version of the SM, where only one Higgs doublet is included and
|
||||||
%massless neutrinos are assumed, lepton flavor conservation is an automatic
|
%massless neutrinos are assumed, lepton conservation is an automatic
|
||||||
%consequence of gauge invariance and the renormalizability of the SM
|
%consequence of gauge invariance and the renormalizability of the SM
|
||||||
%Lagrangian. It is the basis of a natural explanation for the smallness of
|
%Lagrangian. It is the basis of a natural explanation for the smallness of
|
||||||
%lepton flavor violation (LFV) in charged lepton processes.
|
%lepton violation (LFV) in charged lepton processes.
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Muon and its decays in the Standard Model}
|
\section{Muon and its decays in the Standard Model}
|
||||||
@@ -111,15 +121,15 @@ or with an associated $e^+ e^-$ pair:
|
|||||||
\label{eq:mu3e2nu}
|
\label{eq:mu3e2nu}
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dominant process, \micheldecay is commonly called Michel decay. It can be
|
The dominant process, \micheldecay is commonly called the Michel decay. It can
|
||||||
described by the V-A interaction which is a special case of a local,
|
be described by the V-A interaction which is a special case of a local,
|
||||||
derivative-free, lepton-number-conserving four-fermion interaction.
|
derivative-free, lepton-number-conserving four-fermion interaction.
|
||||||
%using $V-A$
|
%using $V-A$
|
||||||
%inteaction, a special case of four-fermion interaction, by Louis
|
%inteaction, a special case of four-fermion interaction, by Louis
|
||||||
%Michel~\cite{Michel.1950}.
|
%Michel~\cite{Michel.1950}.
|
||||||
The model contains independent real parameters that can be determined from
|
The model contains independent real parameters that can be determined from
|
||||||
measurements of muon life time, muon decay and inverse muon
|
measurements of muon life time, muon decay and inverse muon
|
||||||
decay. Experimental results from extensive measurements of Michel parameters
|
decay. Experimental results from extensive measurements of the Michel parameters
|
||||||
are consistent with the predictions of the V-A
|
are consistent with the predictions of the V-A
|
||||||
theory~\cite{Michel.1950,FetscherGerber.etal.1986,BeringerArguin.etal.2012}.
|
theory~\cite{Michel.1950,FetscherGerber.etal.1986,BeringerArguin.etal.2012}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -127,9 +137,9 @@ The radiative decay~\eqref{eq:mue2nugamma} is treated as an internal
|
|||||||
bremsstrahlung process~\cite{EcksteinPratt.1959}.
|
bremsstrahlung process~\cite{EcksteinPratt.1959}.
|
||||||
%It occurs at the rate of about 1\% of all muon decays.
|
%It occurs at the rate of about 1\% of all muon decays.
|
||||||
Since it is not possible to clearly separated this mode
|
Since it is not possible to clearly separated this mode
|
||||||
from Michel decay in the soft-photon limit, the radiative mode is regarded as
|
from the Michel decay in the soft-photon limit, the radiative mode is regarded as
|
||||||
a subset of the Michel decay. An additional parameter is included to describe
|
a subset of the Michel decay. An additional parameter is included to describe
|
||||||
the electron and photon spectra in this decay channel. Like the case of
|
the electron and photon spectra in this decay channel. Like the case of the
|
||||||
Michel decay, experiments results on the branching ratio and the parameter are
|
Michel decay, experiments results on the branching ratio and the parameter are
|
||||||
in agreement with the SM's predictions~\cite{BeringerArguin.etal.2012}.
|
in agreement with the SM's predictions~\cite{BeringerArguin.etal.2012}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -221,8 +231,8 @@ CLFV processes with muons are also suppressed to similar practically
|
|||||||
unmeasurable levels.%\hl{TODO: Feynman diagram}
|
unmeasurable levels.%\hl{TODO: Feynman diagram}
|
||||||
Therefore, any experimental
|
Therefore, any experimental
|
||||||
observation of CLFV would be an unambiguous signal of the physics beyond the
|
observation of CLFV would be an unambiguous signal of the physics beyond the
|
||||||
SM. Many models for physics beyond the SM, including supersymmetric (SUSY)
|
SM. Many theoretical models for physics beyond the SM, including supersymmetric
|
||||||
models, extra dimensional models, little Higgs models, predict
|
(SUSY) models, extra dimensional models, little Higgs models, predict
|
||||||
significantly larger CLFV
|
significantly larger CLFV
|
||||||
~\cite{MarcianoMori.etal.2008, MiharaMiller.etal.2013, BernsteinCooper.2013}.
|
~\cite{MarcianoMori.etal.2008, MiharaMiller.etal.2013, BernsteinCooper.2013}.
|
||||||
%\hl{TODO: DNA of CLFV charts}
|
%\hl{TODO: DNA of CLFV charts}
|
||||||
@@ -257,15 +267,15 @@ significantly larger CLFV
|
|||||||
%occur at large rates by many new physics models,
|
%occur at large rates by many new physics models,
|
||||||
Among the CLFV processes, the \mueg and
|
Among the CLFV processes, the \mueg and
|
||||||
the \muec are expected to have large effect by many models. The current
|
the \muec are expected to have large effect by many models. The current
|
||||||
experimental limits on these two decay modes are set by MEG
|
experimental limits on these two decay modes are set respectively by the MEG
|
||||||
experiment~\cite{Adam.etal.2013} and SINDRUM-II
|
experiment~\cite{Adam.etal.2013} and the SINDRUM-II
|
||||||
experiment~\cite{Bertl.etal.2006}:
|
experiment~\cite{Bertl.etal.2006}:
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\mathcal{B}(\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ \gamma) < 5.7 \times 10^{-13}
|
\mathcal{B}(\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ \gamma) < 5.7 \times 10^{-13}\,
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
, and:
|
and:
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\mathcal{B} (\mu^- + Au \rightarrow e^- +Au) < 7\times 10^{-13}
|
\mathcal{B} (\mu^- + Au \rightarrow e^- +Au) < 7\times 10^{-13}\.
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\hl{TODO: mueg and muec relations, Lagrangian \ldots}
|
%\hl{TODO: mueg and muec relations, Lagrangian \ldots}
|
||||||
@@ -278,25 +288,26 @@ experiment~\cite{Bertl.etal.2006}:
|
|||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
\section{Phenomenology of \mueconv}
|
\section{Phenomenology of \mueconv}
|
||||||
\label{sec:phenomenoly_of_muec}
|
\label{sec:phenomenoly_of_muec}
|
||||||
The conversion of a captured muon into an electron in the field of a nucleus
|
The conversion of a captured negative muon in a muonic atom into an electron
|
||||||
has been one of the most powerful probe to search for CLFV. This section
|
in the field of a nucleus has been one of the most powerful probe to search for
|
||||||
|
CLFV. This section
|
||||||
highlights phenomenology of the \muec.
|
highlights phenomenology of the \muec.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{What is \mueconv}
|
\subsection{What is \mueconv}
|
||||||
\label{sub:what_is_muec}
|
\label{sub:what_is_muec}
|
||||||
When a muon is stopped in a material, it is quickly captured by atoms
|
When a negatively charged muon is stopped in a material, it is quickly captured
|
||||||
into a high orbital momentum state, forming a muonic atom, then
|
by an atom into a high orbital momentum state, forming a muonic atom, then
|
||||||
it rapidly cascades to the lowest state 1S. There, it undergoes either:
|
it rapidly cascades to the lowest state 1S. There, it undergoes either:
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item normal Michel decay: \micheldecay; or
|
\item normal Michel decay: \micheldecay; or
|
||||||
\item weak capture by the nucleus: $\mu^- p \rightarrow \nu_\mu n$
|
\item weak capture by the nucleus: $\mu^- p \rightarrow \nu_\mu n$.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the context of physics beyond the SM, the exotic process of \mueconv where
|
In the context of physics beyond the SM, the exotic process of \mueconv where
|
||||||
a muon decays to an electron without neutrinos is also
|
a muon decays to an electron without neutrinos is also
|
||||||
expected, but it has never been observed.
|
expected, but has never been observed:
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\mu^{-} + N(A,Z) \rightarrow e^{-} + N(A,Z)
|
\mu^{-} + N(A,Z) \rightarrow e^{-} + N(A,Z)\.
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
The emitted electron in this decay
|
The emitted electron in this decay
|
||||||
mode , the \mueconv electron, is mono-energetic at an energy far above the
|
mode , the \mueconv electron, is mono-energetic at an energy far above the
|
||||||
@@ -322,8 +333,8 @@ The quantity measured in searches for \mueconv is the ratio between the rate of
|
|||||||
\frac{\Gamma(\mu^-N \rightarrow e^-N)}{\Gamma(\textrm{capture})}
|
\frac{\Gamma(\mu^-N \rightarrow e^-N)}{\Gamma(\textrm{capture})}
|
||||||
\label{eq:muerate_def}
|
\label{eq:muerate_def}
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
The normalisation to captures has advantages when one does calculation since
|
%The normalisation to captures has advantages when one does calculation since
|
||||||
many details of the nuclear wavefunction cancel out in the ratio.
|
%many details of the nuclear wavefunction cancel out in the ratio.
|
||||||
%Detailed
|
%Detailed
|
||||||
%calculations have been performed by Kitano et al.~\cite{KitanoKoike.etal.2002a,
|
%calculations have been performed by Kitano et al.~\cite{KitanoKoike.etal.2002a,
|
||||||
%KitanoKoike.etal.2007}, and Cirigliano et al.~\cite{Cirig}
|
%KitanoKoike.etal.2007}, and Cirigliano et al.~\cite{Cirig}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Osaka University}
|
|||||||
\begin{abstract}
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
%[\smaller \thetitle\\ \vspace*{1cm} \smaller {\theauthor}]
|
%[\smaller \thetitle\\ \vspace*{1cm} \smaller {\theauthor}]
|
||||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||||
COMET [1] is an experiment that aims to search for a charged lepton flavor
|
COMET [1] is an experiment that aims to search for a charged lepton flavour
|
||||||
violation (CLFV) process, the muon-to-electron conversion in the presence of
|
violation (CLFV) process, the muon-to-electron conversion in the presence of
|
||||||
a nucleus,
|
a nucleus,
|
||||||
\muec. The process is forbidden in the Standard Model (SM), however is
|
\muec. The process is forbidden in the Standard Model (SM), however is
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ following nuclear muon capture\\
|
|||||||
\vspace{2mm}
|
\vspace{2mm}
|
||||||
for the COMET experiment}
|
for the COMET experiment}
|
||||||
\author{Nam Hoai Tran}
|
\author{Nam Hoai Tran}
|
||||||
\date{September, 2014}
|
\date{October, 2014}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{document}
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
\begin{frontmatter}
|
\begin{frontmatter}
|
||||||
@@ -29,14 +29,14 @@ for the COMET experiment}
|
|||||||
\end{frontmatter}
|
\end{frontmatter}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\mainmatter
|
\mainmatter
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap1_intro}
|
%\input{chapters/chap1_intro}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv}
|
\input{chapters/chap2_mu_e_conv}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap3_comet}
|
%\input{chapters/chap3_comet}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys}
|
%\input{chapters/chap4_alcap_phys}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap5_alcap_setup}
|
%\input{chapters/chap5_alcap_setup}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap6_analysis}
|
%\input{chapters/chap6_analysis}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap7_results}
|
%\input{chapters/chap7_results}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/chap8_conclusions}
|
%\input{chapters/chap8_conclusions}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{backmatter}
|
\begin{backmatter}
|
||||||
\input{chapters/backmatter}
|
\input{chapters/backmatter}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user